From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6111AAB35 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EFEC2C4E4 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:29:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from lana.proxmox.com (unknown [94.136.29.99]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:29:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by lana.proxmox.com (Postfix, from userid 10043) id EB6E12C2A84; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:29:44 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Hanreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:29:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20221121122938.249764-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.340 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 0.001 Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 1/1] Do not start VM twice when rollbacking with --start X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:29:52 -0000 When rollbacking to the snapshot of a VM that includes RAM, the VM gets started by the rollback task anyway, so no additional start task is needed. Previously, when running rollback with the --start parameter and the VM snapshot includes RAM, a start task was created. That task failed because the VM had already been started by the rollback task. Additionally documented this behaviour in the description of the --start parameter Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich --- PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm index 6bdcce2..7263a1a 100644 --- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm +++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm @@ -5064,7 +5064,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ snapname => get_standard_option('pve-snapshot-name'), start => { type => 'boolean', - description => "Whether the VM should get started after rolling back successfully", + description => "Whether the VM should get started after rolling back successfully." + . " A VM will always be started when rollbacking a snapshot with RAM included, regardless of this parameter.", optional => 1, default => 0, }, @@ -5092,7 +5093,13 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ PVE::QemuConfig->snapshot_rollback($vmid, $snapname); if ($param->{start}) { - PVE::API2::Qemu->vm_start({ vmid => $vmid, node => $node }); + my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid); + my $snap = $conf->{snapshots}->{$snapname}; + die "snapshot '$snapname' does not exist\n" if !defined($snap); + + if (!$snap->{vmstate}) { + PVE::API2::Qemu->vm_start({ vmid => $vmid, node => $node }); + } } }; -- 2.30.2