From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A44F4A992 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:31:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8435B29DEC for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:31:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:31:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A868744DC8 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:31:36 +0100 (CET) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:31:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20221121083133.39542-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20221121083133.39542-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20221121083133.39542-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] ha: crs: clarify that non-HA-managed services are currently not counted X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:31:37 -0000 Without explicitly stating this, it's rather easily missed. Reported-by: Dominik Csapak Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner --- As Thomas said off-list, it's better to start tracking this information in HA manager too. For now, clarify the status-quo. ha-manager.adoc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ha-manager.adoc b/ha-manager.adoc index 2da6a99..ccbb7f8 100644 --- a/ha-manager.adoc +++ b/ha-manager.adoc @@ -959,6 +959,7 @@ Basic ~~~~~ The number of active HA services on each node is used to choose a recovery node. +Non-HA-managed services are currently not counted. Static ~~~~~~ @@ -966,7 +967,7 @@ Static IMPORTANT: The static mode is still a technology preview. Static usage information from HA services on each node is used to choose a -recovery node. +recovery node. Usage of non-HA-managed services is currently not considered. For this selection, each node in turn is considered as if the service was already running on it, using CPU and memory usage from the associated guest -- 2.30.2