From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78BAC8AB08
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5995D1F029
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE7B144AF1
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:31:17 +0200
Message-Id: <20221021083117.1239396-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20221021083117.1239396-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20221021083117.1239396-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.067 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [accesscontrol.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control v2 3/3] authenticate_user: pass
undef instead of empty $tfa_challenge to authenticate_2nd_new
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:31:49 -0000
just above, we check & return if $tfa_challenge is set, so there is no
way that it would be set here. To make it clearer that it must be undef
here pass it as such.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
src/PVE/AccessControl.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm b/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
index 3d77bed..5addcbf 100644
--- a/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ sub authenticate_user : prototype($$$$;$) {
if ($new_format) {
# This is the first factor with an optional immediate 2nd factor for TOTP:
- my $tfa_challenge = authenticate_2nd_new($username, $realm, $otp, $tfa_challenge);
+ my $tfa_challenge = authenticate_2nd_new($username, $realm, $otp, undef);
return wantarray ? ($username, $tfa_challenge) : $username;
} else {
return authenticate_2nd_old($username, $realm, $otp);
--
2.30.2