From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11CE915FB for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:55:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 830DC25DF7 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:54:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:54:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7DAD9445FE for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:54:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:54:52 +0200 Message-Id: <20220928075452.15882-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: qemu: options: use 'first disk' for legacy 'c' boot setting X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 07:55:27 -0000 The kvm man page mentions that using 'c' will try booting from the first hard disk, so the current '(no bootdisk)' text in the UI is not accurate, and boot can still succeed. Reported in the community forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/115800/ Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner --- An alternative would be using 'no explicit bootdisk'. www/manager6/qemu/Options.js | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/Options.js b/www/manager6/qemu/Options.js index a1def4bb..7b112400 100644 --- a/www/manager6/qemu/Options.js +++ b/www/manager6/qemu/Options.js @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.Options', { if (bootdisk) { text += bootdisk; } else { - text += gettext('(no bootdisk)'); + text += gettext('first disk'); } } else if (sel === 'n') { text += gettext('any net'); -- 2.30.2