From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68768704FD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  6 May 2022 14:39:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A0CAD36D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  6 May 2022 14:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 9B5EFD359
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  6 May 2022 14:38:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 63D52431E5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  6 May 2022 14:38:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri,  6 May 2022 14:38:35 +0200
Message-Id: <20220506123836.99473-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.079 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu 1/2] block/gluster: correctly set
 max_pdiscard which is int64_t
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 12:39:14 -0000

Previously, max_pdiscard would be zero in the following assertion:
qemu-system-x86_64: ../block/io.c:3166: bdrv_co_pdiscard: Assertion
`max_pdiscard >= bs->bl.request_alignment' failed.

Fixes: 0c8022876f ("block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers")
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---

Changes from v1:
    * Re-send as patch so both fixes can be applied independently.

Reported in the community forum:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/108875
and thanks to Mira for telling me how to reproduce it.

 block/gluster.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c
index 398976bc66..592e71b22a 100644
--- a/block/gluster.c
+++ b/block/gluster.c
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ out:
 static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
 {
     bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER;
-    bs->bl.max_pdiscard = SIZE_MAX;
+    bs->bl.max_pdiscard = INT64_MAX;
 }
 
 static int qemu_gluster_reopen_prepare(BDRVReopenState *state,
@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ static coroutine_fn int qemu_gluster_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs,
     GlusterAIOCB acb;
     BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque;
 
-    assert(bytes <= SIZE_MAX); /* rely on max_pdiscard */
+    assert(bytes <= INT64_MAX); /* rely on max_pdiscard */
 
     acb.size = 0;
     acb.ret = 0;
-- 
2.30.2