From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A36A803E9 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:05:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 09A7ACA52 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:05:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 467DCCA3F for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:05:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CCA0343DA3 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:05:04 +0100 (CET) From: Fabian Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:05:01 +0100 Message-Id: <20211117130501.69274-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20211117130501.69274-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20211117130501.69274-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.181 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] cluster: migration: use back-ticked insecure when referring to the setting X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:05:36 -0000 Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner --- pvecm.adoc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pvecm.adoc b/pvecm.adoc index 26b52cf..48c3927 100644 --- a/pvecm.adoc +++ b/pvecm.adoc @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ Migration Type The migration type defines if the migration data should be sent over an encrypted (`secure`) channel or an unencrypted (`insecure`) one. -Setting the migration type to insecure means that the RAM content of a +Setting the migration type to `insecure` means that the RAM content of a virtual guest is also transferred unencrypted, which can lead to information disclosure of critical data from inside the guest (for example, passwords or encryption keys). @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ NOTE: Storage migration does not follow this setting. Currently, it always sends the storage content over a secure channel. Encryption requires a lot of computing power, so this setting is often -changed to "unsafe" to achieve better performance. The impact on +changed to `insecure` to achieve better performance. The impact on modern systems is lower because they implement AES encryption in hardware. The performance impact is particularly evident in fast networks, where you can transfer 10 Gbps or more. -- 2.30.2