From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D54D6B2F3
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EAFC1DFE5
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BD4AA1DFDA
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:56:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 71479446EB
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:56:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:55:51 +0200
Message-Id: <20210920085551.48298-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.563 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix #3629: ui: rng: increase default
ratelimit to 2048 B/s
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:56:01 -0000
FreeBSD 13 VMs will bug out and consume loads of idle CPU time if the
ratelimit is 1024 B/s or lower. Increasing to 2048 fixes the issue,
confirmed experimentally, and doesn't seem much worse as a default.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
---
On the one hand this *really* sounds like a FreeBSD bug to me, even reading
through their bugtracker linked from the report in ours.
But on the other, 2048 doesn't sound much worse as a limit either, and since
this appears to be a rather new bug I think it's enough to change it in the GUI
and avoid any hassle with API default changes.
An "ostype" for BSDs might be nice too I suppose. Not sure "Other" would cover
this, I personally use "Linux" for my BSD VMs...
www/manager6/qemu/RNGEdit.js | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/RNGEdit.js b/www/manager6/qemu/RNGEdit.js
index e34e2c08..84fdf585 100644
--- a/www/manager6/qemu/RNGEdit.js
+++ b/www/manager6/qemu/RNGEdit.js
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.RNGInputPanel', {
name: 'max_bytes',
minValue: 0,
step: 1,
- value: 1024,
+ value: 2048,
fieldLabel: gettext('Limit (Bytes/Period)'),
labelWidth: 130,
emptyText: gettext('unlimited'),
--
2.30.2