From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE67E77533
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:09:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9C5C29891
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 98E759884
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:08:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6B6BE40523
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:08:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:08:48 +0200
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20210720120848.jt6utnuojtn2ygya@wobu-vie.proxmox.com>
References: <20210714095151.138084-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
 <20210720114059.p5k32l5jap3nudz3@wobu-vie.proxmox.com>
 <84bdf0fe-783e-1ed8-9fa9-70b817ea5221@proxmox.com>
 <YPa432Ubk3HI2L5a@gaia>
 <95dc2d98-ec11-e8c9-1761-9fe91d18af1a@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <95dc2d98-ec11-e8c9-1761-9fe91d18af1a@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.666 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v3] fix #3516: fix unmanaged
 containers
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 12:09:20 -0000

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:59:45PM +0200, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> or we can avoid further hacks, separate the plugin ABI in an actual "interface only"
> module which base and a new unmanaged plugin depends on, so that we can actually drop
> that special case and with it all the `return if  !$self->{plugin}; # unmanaged` stanzas
> completely...

sounds good to me 👍