From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72549707DA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33C7E12D81; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 87A6B12D31; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5F6A3464FA; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Reiter To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:35:24 +0200 Message-Id: <20210607153532.2522267-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210607153532.2522267-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> References: <20210607153532.2522267-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.908 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/9] tools/BroadcastFuture: add testcase for better understanding X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:35:51 -0000 Explicitly test that data will stay available and can be retrieved immediately via listen(), even if the future producing the data and notifying the consumers was already run in the past. Wasn't broken or anything, but helps with understanding IMO. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter --- Wasn't broken or anything, but helps with understanding IMO. src/tools/broadcast_future.rs | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs b/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs index 88b7aaab..7bfd83b7 100644 --- a/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs +++ b/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs @@ -166,4 +166,15 @@ fn test_broadcast_future() { let result = CHECKSUM.load(Ordering::SeqCst); assert_eq!(result, 3); + + // the result stays available until the BroadcastFuture is dropped + rt.block_on(sender.listen() + .map_ok(|res| { + CHECKSUM.fetch_add(res*4, Ordering::SeqCst); + }) + .map_err(|err| { panic!("got error {}", err); }) + .map(|_| ())); + + let result = CHECKSUM.load(Ordering::SeqCst); + assert_eq!(result, 7); } -- 2.30.2