From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7A87497E;
Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4A5EDC948;
Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CE181C930;
Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8D48946702;
Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:38:25 +0200
Message-Id: <20210602143833.4423-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20210602143833.4423-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20210602143833.4423-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/9] tools/BroadcastFuture: add
testcase for better understanding
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 14:38:44 -0000
Explicitly test that data will stay available and can be retrieved
immediately via listen(), even if the future producing the data and
notifying the consumers was already run in the past.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
---
Wasn't broken or anything, but helps with understanding IMO.
src/tools/broadcast_future.rs | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs b/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs
index 88b7aaab..7bfd83b7 100644
--- a/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs
+++ b/src/tools/broadcast_future.rs
@@ -166,4 +166,15 @@ fn test_broadcast_future() {
let result = CHECKSUM.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
assert_eq!(result, 3);
+
+ // the result stays available until the BroadcastFuture is dropped
+ rt.block_on(sender.listen()
+ .map_ok(|res| {
+ CHECKSUM.fetch_add(res*4, Ordering::SeqCst);
+ })
+ .map_err(|err| { panic!("got error {}", err); })
+ .map(|_| ()));
+
+ let result = CHECKSUM.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
+ assert_eq!(result, 7);
}
--
2.30.2