From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA5872F93 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21BF5155FD for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7B067155F4 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34E414668A for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Stoiko Ivanov To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:51:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20210526145159.13175-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.007 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH firewall] set sysctls on every apply X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:52:24 -0000 setting the sysctls needed on every run should not be too costly (the original implementation used a `system` invocation, which was far more expensive), and reduce the chances for side-effects. Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov --- tested quickly on a test-installation of mine src/PVE/Firewall.pm | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/PVE/Firewall.pm b/src/PVE/Firewall.pm index 50be187..fc5c077 100644 --- a/src/PVE/Firewall.pm +++ b/src/PVE/Firewall.pm @@ -1818,11 +1818,9 @@ sub rules_audit_permissions { } # core functions -my $bridge_firewall_enabled = 0; sub enable_bridge_firewall { - return if $bridge_firewall_enabled; # only once PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables", "1"); PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-ip6tables", "1"); @@ -1830,7 +1828,6 @@ sub enable_bridge_firewall { # make sure syncookies are enabled (which is default on newer 3.X kernels anyways) PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "1"); - $bridge_firewall_enabled = 1; } sub iptables_restore_cmdlist { -- 2.20.1