From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4493B78883 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:55:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 390E796FD for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:54:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 05A5996CF for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:54:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C34D8464D4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:54:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabian Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:54:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20210430135437.4816-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20210430135437.4816-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20210430135437.4816-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [mon.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [RFC manager 2/5] api: ceph: create mon: handle ms_bind_ipv* options more generally X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:55:13 -0000 mostly relevant to prepare support for IPv4/IPv6 dual stack mode as a special case of the planned support for mutliple public networks. As before, only set the false value when we are dealing with the first address, but also be explicit about the IPv4 case as the defaults might change in the future. Then, when an address of a different type comes along later, set the relevant bind option to true. Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner --- PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm index 8f2d5bc4..618d3f06 100644 --- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm +++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm @@ -259,6 +259,15 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({ run_command(['chown', 'ceph:ceph', $mondir]); + my $is_first_address = !defined($rados); + if (Net::IP::ip_is_ipv6($ip)) { + $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv6} = 'true'; + $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv4} = 'false' if $is_first_address; + } else { + $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv4} = 'true'; + $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv6} = 'false' if $is_first_address; + } + if (defined($rados)) { # we can only have a RADOS object if we have a monitor my $mapdata = $rados->mon_command({ prefix => 'mon getmap', format => 'plain' }); file_set_contents($monmap, $mapdata); @@ -266,8 +275,6 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({ my $monaddr = $ip; if (Net::IP::ip_is_ipv6($ip)) { $monaddr = "[$ip]"; - $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv6} = 'true'; - $cfg->{global}->{ms_bind_ipv4} = 'false'; } run_command([ 'monmaptool', -- 2.20.1