From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FB5477F3C for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 964B91A062 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kvmformation3.odiso.net (globalOdiso.M6Lille.odiso.net [89.248.211.242]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 19F8F1A04D for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:15:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kvmformation3.odiso.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id C714A74A64; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:14:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre Derumier To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:14:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20210429101454.35870-1-aderumier@odiso.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL -0.165 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.25 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS 0.399 Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS NO_DNS_FOR_FROM 0.379 Envelope sender has no MX or A DNS records SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [qinqplugin.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 0/3] zones: qinq : fix mutiples vnets/qinq zones X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:15:04 -0000 This fix bugs with qinq when vmbr0 is ovs or classic bridge, when we define multiple vnets/qinq zones Alexandre Derumier (3): zones: qinq: ovs: fix duplicate ovs_ports with multiple zones/vnets zones: qinq: classic bridge: fix bridge zone name with multiple zones/vnets zones: qinq: vlanaware bridge: add tests with multiple vnets/zones PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/QinQPlugin.pm | 10 +++--- .../zones/qinq/bridge/expected_sdn_interfaces | 33 +++++++++++++++++-- test/zones/qinq/bridge/sdn_config | 7 +++- .../bridge_vlanaware/expected_sdn_interfaces | 21 ++++++++++++ test/zones/qinq/bridge_vlanaware/sdn_config | 7 +++- .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- .../expected_sdn_interfaces | 6 ++-- test/zones/qinq/ovs/expected_sdn_interfaces | 28 +++++++++++++++- test/zones/qinq/ovs/sdn_config | 7 +++- 9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1