From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943A274708
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:47:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 89F761256D
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[212.186.127.180])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4AD431255A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:46:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0E81B42589
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:46:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:46:43 +0200
Message-Id: <20210419084643.30634-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
In-Reply-To: <20210419084643.30634-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210419084643.30634-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.007 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 2/2] destroy VM: also check if
unused volumes are base images
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:47:21 -0000
It's arguably not likely in practice that only an unused volume is still in use
as a base image, but do it for completeness sake.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
index 1af2b53..dce1193 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
@@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ sub destroy_vm {
if ($conf->{template}) {
# check if any base image is still used by a linked clone
- PVE::QemuConfig->foreach_volume($conf, sub {
+ PVE::QemuConfig->foreach_volume_full($conf, { include_unused => 1 }, sub {
my ($ds, $drive) = @_;
return if drive_is_cdrom($drive);
--
2.20.1