From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22CAF68EA6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1179A9E12
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 54F4E9E07
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1FFAA447F3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:07 +0100
Message-Id: <20210222132407.30337-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH common] network: get_local_ip_from_cidr: return
 unique IPs
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:24:13 -0000

to avoid erroring out when "multiple" addresses are configured on live
migration, when in fact it's the same IP multiple times.

Seems like the same problem for a caller in pve-cluster was fixed by checking
the uniqueness afterwards, see commit 266041169beb36c8892ca54265e2d91335307ffb
in pve-cluster. But there doesn't seem to be any caller relying on the current
behavior, and no additional information other than the addresses are returned,
so fix it here.

Reported here:
https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/live-migration-of-vms-via-full-mesh-network-could-not-get-ip-multiple-addresses-configured-on-local-node-for-network.84585/

Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
 src/PVE/Network.pm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/Network.pm b/src/PVE/Network.pm
index 12536c7..3b1afdd 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Network.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Network.pm
@@ -599,14 +599,14 @@ sub is_ip_in_cidr {
 sub get_local_ip_from_cidr {
     my ($cidr) = @_;
 
-    my $IPs = [];
+    my $IPs = {};
     run_command(['/sbin/ip', 'address', 'show', 'to', $cidr, 'up'], outfunc => sub {
 	if ($_[0] =~ m!^\s*inet(?:6)?\s+($PVE::Tools::IPRE)(?:/\d+|\s+peer\s+)!) {
-	    push @$IPs, $1;
+	    $IPs->{$1} = 1;
 	}
     });
 
-    return $IPs;
+    return [ keys %{$IPs} ];
 }
 
 sub addr_to_ip {
-- 
2.20.1