From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB5A62B15 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:14:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B856D22639 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:13:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 63A8522625 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:13:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2A1F74552B for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:13:52 +0100 (CET) From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:13:50 +0100 Message-Id: <20201221151351.30575-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20201221151351.30575-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20201221151351.30575-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/3] pvereport: rework report contents X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:14:23 -0000 add: * HA status * ceph osd df tree * ceph conf file and conf db * ceph versions removed: * ceph status, as pveceph status is now printing the same information Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer --- @Thomas, we did discuss using the cluster/ceph/metadata endpoint off list for more information about running services and other stuff like needed restarts after updates. Since it returns a lot of JSON that needs to be filtered to be useful and not littering the report, I will need a bit more time to see what would be needed and how to filter for that. For now with the changed pveceph status (ceph -s) output we already get an overview if any expected services are not running and with `ceph versions` we get an idea which versions and if multiple versions are present in the cluster. I think this is okay for now to get a good impression and quite a lot more hints where to investigate further. PVE/Report.pm | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/Report.pm b/PVE/Report.pm index 5ee3453d..f8d5e663 100644 --- a/PVE/Report.pm +++ b/PVE/Report.pm @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ my $init_report_cmds = sub { cluster => [ 'pvecm nodes', 'pvecm status', - 'cat /etc/pve/corosync.conf 2>/dev/null' + 'cat /etc/pve/corosync.conf 2>/dev/null', + 'ha-manager status', ], bios => [ 'dmidecode -t bios', @@ -76,7 +77,9 @@ my $init_report_cmds = sub { if (-e '/etc/ceph/ceph.conf') { # TODO: add (now working) rdb ls over all pools? really needed? - push @{$report_def->{volumes}}, 'ceph status', 'ceph osd status', 'ceph df', 'pveceph status', 'pveceph pool ls'; + push @{$report_def->{volumes}}, 'pveceph status', 'ceph osd status', + 'ceph df', 'ceph osd df tree', 'cat /etc/ceph/ceph.conf', + 'ceph config dump', 'pveceph pool ls', 'ceph versions'; } push @{$report_def->{disks}}, 'multipath -ll', 'multipath -v3' -- 2.20.1