From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D4860FE9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:54:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3EAC423EFB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:54:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C17B823EF1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8458643BB5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:54:20 +0100
From: Dominic =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20201119105420.GA66443@mala.proxmox.com>
References: <20201002082354.20204-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <8ca313df-8bec-72da-3b2a-55a289b2a02d@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8ca313df-8bec-72da-3b2a-55a289b2a02d@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.703 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [importdisk.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 serries 0/4] disk reassign: add new
 feature
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:54:53 -0000

Gave it a quick test: Moving some disks from one VM to another on a CIFS
storage worked for me.  Had to do some conflict resolution upon application
though.
=> If (there is more feedback and) you rebase it, then I can test it (+ GUI) more thoroughly :)

I would probably rename the parameter name drive_key for qm to something that
already exists in our code, because to me it looks like we have different names
for it already
 - Bus/Device in the GUI
 - the word (ide, scsi)  is called Bus/Controller in man qm
 - the word is called interface (of a drive) in QemuServer.pm
 - we have $deviceid =~ m/^(virtio)(\d+)$/ in qemu-server, so the whole word+integer
 - and also "my $drive_id = "$drive->{interface}$drive->{index}";
 - we have "{drive_name} may be used to specify ide0, scsi1, etc ..." in the (old) Importdisk.pm
 - and in ControllerSelector.js the first half is controller and the integer is deviceid

And for me it would make sense to minimize those differences.

Tested-by: Dominic Jäger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:42:23AM +0100, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Does anyone have time to take a look at the latest iteration of these patches?
> 
> Thx :)
> 
> On 10/2/20 10:23 AM, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> > deleted as well because it still had the VMID of VM A in it's name.
> > 
> > To issue a reassign from the CLI run:
> > 
> > qm reassign_disk <source VMID> <target VMID> <drive key>
> > 
> > where <drive key> is the config key of the disk, e.g. ide0, scsi1 and so
> > on.
> > 
> > The following storage types are implemented at the moment:
> > * dir based ones
> >      * CIFS