From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F1969628 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:01:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 814541A77A for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:01:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 704C81A76F for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:01:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 393364219A for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:01:13 +0100 (CET) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:01:12 +0100 Message-Id: <20201113120112.900-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.361 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: remove sum for percentages of ceph pools X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:01:44 -0000 because different pools can have different crush rules, etc. the sum of the 'percentage used' column makes no real sense, so we remove it Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js b/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js index 11bcf9d5..271dcc3c 100644 --- a/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js +++ b/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js @@ -164,10 +164,6 @@ Ext.define('PVE.node.CephPoolList', { return Ext.util.Format.percent(val, '0.00'); }, dataIndex: 'percent_used', - summaryType: 'sum', - summaryRenderer: function(val) { - return Ext.util.Format.percent(val, '0.00'); - }, }, { text: gettext('Total'), -- 2.20.1