From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1687961004 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04F8B2546D for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 50EC02545F for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:42:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1A72845CDF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:42:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 14:42:35 +0200 From: Alwin Antreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <20201012124235.GA235013@dona.proxmox.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alwin Antreich , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20200925125146.1945521-1-a.antreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200925125146.1945521-1-a.antreich@proxmox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/2] move footnote of Ceph's intro into TIP section X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:42:40 -0000 On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 02:51:45PM +0200, Alwin Antreich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich > --- > Note: The footnote in the title section broke the link building for that > footnote when used with a variable on the beginning of the url. > The parser seems to look for an http(s) and considers it text > otherwise. But interestingly it worked with the other footnotes. > > Should my note rather go into the commit message? > > pveceph.adoc | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/pveceph.adoc b/pveceph.adoc > index baf0988..0f94b97 100644 > --- a/pveceph.adoc > +++ b/pveceph.adoc > @@ -58,12 +58,14 @@ and VMs on the same node is possible. > To simplify management, we provide 'pveceph' - a tool to install and > manage {ceph} services on {pve} nodes. > > -.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons footnote:[Ceph intro https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/start/intro/], for use as a RBD storage: > +.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons, for use as a RBD storage: > - Ceph Monitor (ceph-mon) > - Ceph Manager (ceph-mgr) > - Ceph OSD (ceph-osd; Object Storage Daemon) > > -TIP: We highly recommend to get familiar with Ceph's architecture > +TIP: We highly recommend to get familiar with Ceph > +footnote:[Ceph intro https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/start/intro/], > +its architecture > footnote:[Ceph architecture https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/architecture/] > and vocabulary > footnote:[Ceph glossary https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/glossary]. > -- > 2.27.0 May one of the maintainers please review my patches? Thanks.