From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D39460D5B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 43F421B5FA for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5F3821B5E6 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:51:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2911B45657 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:51:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Alwin Antreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:51:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20200925125146.1945521-1-a.antreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ceph.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/2] move footnote of Ceph's intro into TIP section X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:51:52 -0000 Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich --- Note: The footnote in the title section broke the link building for that footnote when used with a variable on the beginning of the url. The parser seems to look for an http(s) and considers it text otherwise. But interestingly it worked with the other footnotes. Should my note rather go into the commit message? pveceph.adoc | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pveceph.adoc b/pveceph.adoc index baf0988..0f94b97 100644 --- a/pveceph.adoc +++ b/pveceph.adoc @@ -58,12 +58,14 @@ and VMs on the same node is possible. To simplify management, we provide 'pveceph' - a tool to install and manage {ceph} services on {pve} nodes. -.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons footnote:[Ceph intro https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/start/intro/], for use as a RBD storage: +.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons, for use as a RBD storage: - Ceph Monitor (ceph-mon) - Ceph Manager (ceph-mgr) - Ceph OSD (ceph-osd; Object Storage Daemon) -TIP: We highly recommend to get familiar with Ceph's architecture +TIP: We highly recommend to get familiar with Ceph +footnote:[Ceph intro https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/start/intro/], +its architecture footnote:[Ceph architecture https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/architecture/] and vocabulary footnote:[Ceph glossary https://docs.ceph.com/docs/{ceph_codename}/glossary]. -- 2.27.0