From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5FF1FF185 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 09:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EDE3F1C9DD; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 09:49:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 09:49:12 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" , "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" Message-ID: <2018857942.2617.1751874552849@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1861462900.2272.1751630318843@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev79 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.045 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES v7 pve-storage/qemu-server] add external qcow2 snapshot support X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: "t.lamprecht@proxmox.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" > DERUMIER, Alexandre hat am 04.07.2025 14:10 CEST geschrieben: > >>it would also be great if you could add a patch bumping API version > >>and age > I was not sure it was needed, as Fiona has just bumped it in last > patches and no .deb has been released ? we could maybe skip bumping twice, that's true > >> and > >>documenting the changes/new parameters/interfaces - also so that we > >>can ensure > >>we are on the same page and haven't overlooked anything. AFAICT it > >>should all be > >>new opt-in or backwards compatible changes, once the feedback is > >>incorporated. > > ok, will do ! but this is still needed in any case ;) _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel