From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205EC1FF189
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:54:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9CC781F6B6;
Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:54:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1d54d0c9-36b8-416d-8001-1d8bf6377a57@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:53:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250328171340.885413-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<9f0eb0fa-13b5-4df7-adaf-904046a3317e@proxmox.com>
<la7nku73haisbl3y6ttqyrdomqiwowc2fnrvln4agbuowfehtl@s4axlepcy6ye>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Hannes Duerr <h.duerr@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <la7nku73haisbl3y6ttqyrdomqiwowc2fnrvln4agbuowfehtl@s4axlepcy6ye>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.033 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster/docs/manager/network/proxmox{, -ve-rs,
-firewall, -perl-rs} 00/52] Add SDN Fabrics
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On 4/4/25 14:48, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> On 04.04.2025 12:55, Hannes Duerr wrote:
>> On 3/28/25 18:12, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>>> This series allows the user to add fabrics such as OpenFabric and
>>> OSPF over
>>> their clusters.
>>>
>>> Overview
>>> ========
>>>
>>> This series allows the user to create routed networks ('fabrics')
>>> across their
>>> clusters, which can be used as the underlay network for a EVPN
>>> cluster, or for
>>> creating Ceph full mesh clusters easily.
>>>
>>> This patch series adds the initial support for two routing protocols:
>>> * OpenFabric
>>> * OSPF
>>>
>>> In the future we plan on moving the existing IS-IS and BGP
>>> controllers into the
>>> fabric structure. There are also plans for adding a new Wireguard
>>> fabric to
>>> this.
>> Very nice feature and from my first impression it works really well!
>> What I have noticed so far:
>> 1. if you remove interfaces from a node in OSPF you can't add them
>> later [snip]
>
> Umm this is weird, I couldn't reproduce this... Do you get any error or
> does the interface simply vanish. Does editing the node again (new
> NodeEdit popup) fix the error or is the interface still gone?
>
The interface is just not shown anymore when i edit the node.
I have to destroy the Node and create it again so see all interfaces again.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel