From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46367373A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 88ED822332
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 002DB22327
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 14:53:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A775940E6F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 14:53:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1d05dfcd-b73a-863e-7c26-f38d6591bb78@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:53:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20210706121348.3505015-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210706121348.3505015-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.510 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [pve6to7.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH manager 0/5] pve6to7 ceph fixes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:53:27 -0000

On 06.07.21 14:13, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
> reduce checks, adapt version guards, make the whole thing work with
> pve-manager 7.x
>=20
> last patch is stable-6 only, rest is for both branches.
>=20
> Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler (5):
>   pve6to7: use new flags API
>   pve6to7: remove PASS noise for ceph
>   pve6to7: check for >=3D Octopus
>   pve6to7: dont guard noout check on Ceph version
>   pve6to7: enable noout before upgrade
>=20
>  PVE/CLI/pve6to7.pm | 39 +++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>=20



applied series to master and stable-6 respectively, thanks!