From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12C2F9DBC3 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E83EC3027E for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B8D1548B93 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:42:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1a4178e6-109d-fd5e-776d-8f8f0a98478a@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:42:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230228105410.51078-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20230228105410.51078-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.094 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES guest-common/container/qemu-server/ha-manager] make HA manager not depend on internal configuration details X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 06:42:54 -0000 Am 28.02.23 um 11:54 schrieb Fiona Ebner: > by introducing a get_derived_property() method for the configuration > plugins. The derived properties are calculated by the plugins and will > stay the same regardless of changes to the configuration structure. > For example, this will allow turning QemuConfig's 'memory' into a > property string (still requires a versioned Breaks for older HA > manager). > > Dependency bumps ha-manager -> container,qemu-server are needed. > Should this be applied together with the versioned Breaks? That Breaks is needed in preparation for Alexandre's memory hotplug rework series[0]. Now would be a good opportunity for the versioned Breaks. [0]: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-February/055920.html