From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FEF69A73
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 06:32:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 268C81FED1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 06:32:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AFDD11FEC6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 06:32:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FD1444E0D;
 Mon,  7 Dec 2020 06:32:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 06:32:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Kamil_Trzci=C5=84ski?= <ayufan@ayufan.eu>
Message-ID: <1908846064.989.1607319136104@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Uffk_gWE9yqFQBn8WzRKf93hu_GtHoraoBj_gLDQNLKTqSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ-Uffn1eVivrsxHxVJJjoUp-gJue0BHZ9coYACTssQBaoK+vQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ-Uffk_gWE9yqFQBn8WzRKf93hu_GtHoraoBj_gLDQNLKTqSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev14
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.136 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Compiling PBS on arm64
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 05:32:25 -0000


> On 12/06/2020 8:41 PM Kamil Trzci=C5=84ski <ayufan@ayufan.eu> wrote:
>=20
> =20
> I'm slightly progressing, but I stumbled across some `debcargo` problem. =
It
> appears that
> Proxmox uses their own fork of `debcargo`, which is needed in order to
> build crates
> without the usage of crates.io.=20

I guess you can simply adopt/remove the .cargo/config file we ship with our
packages. Cargo will use normal repos then.