From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 424FF68FC3 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2AD4E222D9 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [89.248.211.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 61C88222CC for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B5815F9EE7; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id Pv1JVFwRZCrR; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027F115F9EE8; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailpro.odiso.com Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id tL19z6SfcjFy; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [10.1.31.111]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB20A15F9EE7; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:51:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre DERUMIER To: Thomas Lamprecht Cc: pve-devel Message-ID: <1844854487.155436.1598619062646.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: <110ea3a0-4076-96fa-b31b-aca0188ed2bb@proxmox.com> References: <20200827111655.22957-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <110ea3a0-4076-96fa-b31b-aca0188ed2bb@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC83 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: sdn patches ready for review Thread-Index: y0IJhfJzgMn7lIS461lMjpei3U01dg== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] sdn patches ready for review X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:51:34 -0000 Hi everybody, I think my summer work on sdn is ready for review. I have implemented subnet/nat/ipam/dns registration. I'll stop to add new feature for now, I have planned time in september for fixes,cleanup. Here the different patch series: [pve-devel] [PATCH v7 pve-network 00/21] sdn : add subnets management https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044850.html [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 pve-manager 0/8] sdn : add subnets management https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044775.html [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 pve-cluster 0/4] sdn : add subnets management https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044770.html [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-docs 0/2] simple zone + subnet/ipam documentation https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044874.html For testing subnet/ipam in lxc (is really a poc, do not apply) -> [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-container] POC : add/del/update ip from vnet-subnet-ipam https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044781.html Currently, if you use a vnet with subnet with registered ipam, and you keep the ip field empty, it'll auto-assign an ip. (or you can still defined your own ip, it'll be registered in pam too)