From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7094CF65C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:38:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 59F0522564 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:38:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:38:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 966E14381A; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:38:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <180f5a87-d052-918a-a2e3-2d144a33ec4c@proxmox.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:38:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, aderumier@odiso.com References: <20221209192726.1499142-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <20221209192726.1499142-2-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20221209192726.1499142-2-aderumier@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 01/10] test: add memory tests X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:38:36 -0000 Am 09.12.22 um 20:27 schrieb Alexandre Derumier: > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com> > --- > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug-hugepages.conf | 12 ++ > .../cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug-hugepages.conf.cmd | 62 +++++++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug.conf | 11 ++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug.conf.cmd | 174 ++++++++++++++++++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-1g.conf | 11 ++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-1g.conf.cmd | 30 +++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-2m.conf | 11 ++ > test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-2m.conf.cmd | 30 +++ > 8 files changed, 341 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug-hugepages.conf > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug-hugepages.conf.cmd > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug.conf > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hotplug.conf.cmd > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-1g.conf > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-1g.conf.cmd > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-2m.conf > create mode 100644 test/cfg2cmd/memory-hugepages-2m.conf.cmd Some of these didn't work on my development VM: > got unexpected error: host NUMA node1 doesn't exist I had to enable NUMA for the VM to make it work, but ideally such tests should work on all setups.