From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D863B1FF0BC
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:43:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9F50E21425;
	Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:43:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH pve-firewall 1/1] rules: verify no interface is set
 for rules with direction forward
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:43:00 +0100
Message-ID: <179330297832.2066708.8341065255188237449.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260626122019.175700-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
References: <20260626122019.175700-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793302986384
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.426 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: X5GRFHPTDIY3C33WH35ZV45OM3RHEMDF
X-Message-ID-Hash: X5GRFHPTDIY3C33WH35ZV45OM3RHEMDF
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:20:17 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> It is not possible to specify the iface option for rules with
> direction forward. This has not been verified by the backend, which
> made it very easy to accidentally create invalid FORWARD chain rules.

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] rules: verify no interface is set for rules with direction forward
      commit: 09225d8fc90c3b24b248e29b832e7ff08c42eb88