From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57AED1FF0AA
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06EEC2159F;
	Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH qemu-server v3 8/8] hotplug: name the missing bridge
 in the error message
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:23:23 +0200
Message-ID: <179250968632.184948.4524536826954910128.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20261007142145.984970-9-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20261007142145.984970-9-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792509886061
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.349 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: T4DXYUZ4PDOQZM4QFXS5KG32KHW3LSTU
X-Message-ID-Hash: T4DXYUZ4PDOQZM4QFXS5KG32KHW3LSTU
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Wed, 07 Oct 2026 16:17:52 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> Recently it was uncovered that hotplugging scsiX >= 14 does not work
> in all situations. Inspired by this, this attempts to add some hotplug
> regression tests by simulating the qmp/hmp environment, recording the
> calls and testing against some invariants.
> 
> This uncovered three additional bugs in the hotplug code:
> * hotplugging a tablet device into an aarch64 vm fails
> * hot unplugging a tablet device into an aarch64 vm left over the keyboard
> * failure to hotplug a disk with iothreds leaves the iothread behind
> 
> [...]

Applied this one already, thanks!

[8/8] hotplug: name the missing bridge in the error message
      commit: 59cf25ad66fd35741855aa3de7ac24bc9835eb02