From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 396241FF0A8 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:06:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 49BFD213E6; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:06:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Dietmar Maurer Subject: applied: [PATCH pve-docs] installation: zfs: hdsize applies to all disks of the pool Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: <179225678161.2530217.16829295306186078541.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261016075808.1393338-1-dietmar@proxmox.com> References: <20261016075808.1393338-1-dietmar@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792256800832 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.491 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: UJ3YU6EUTZ6QRFHZNLAE2CVZKX5GECBI X-Message-ID-Hash: UJ3YU6EUTZ6QRFHZNLAE2CVZKX5GECBI X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:58:08 +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > Since pve-installer commit 8269582 ("zfs: assume that all devices are > boot devices"), the installer partitions every disk of a ZFS setup as a > boot disk and limits each of them to hdsize, at every RAID level. The > restriction to the first disk or mirror of a RAID0, RAID1 or RAID10 > setup predates that change. > > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] installation: zfs: hdsize applies to all disks of the pool commit: c673ee6c62ec2bf4e33a05fcd1a0f0a29b18d2f7