From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F4A1FF0B7
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:56:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C673221649;
	Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:56:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH v2 manager 0/1] ceph: init: clean up deprecated
 pg_bits parameter
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:55:57 +0200
Message-ID: <179210495464.3646377.85783369780060634.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260328112307.1131390-1-k.chai@proxmox.com>
References: <20260328112307.1131390-1-k.chai@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1792104965311
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.537 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: R3K6HKI72A5IM622VJVQYH3YVGQSJ3VT
X-Message-ID-Hash: R3K6HKI72A5IM622VJVQYH3YVGQSJ3VT
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 19:23:06 +0800, Kefu Chai wrote:
> Changes since v1:
> - Keep the pg_bits parameter definition in the API schema as a documented
>   no-op, per Thomas's feedback that removing an API parameter is a breaking
>   change that should not happen during the 9.x cycle.
> - Defer full parameter removal to PVE 10.
> - Fix typos in the TODO comment and description.
> - The dead-code comment removal from v1 is kept as-is.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ceph: init: clean up deprecated pg_bits parameter
      https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f10ce40aec913e6d7079bab0fd3be2b2b27d70f