From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2551C1FF09B
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE8AA213E1;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:38:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH manager] fix #8098: ui: ceph: osd: sort OSDs
 naturally by name
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:38:36 +0200
Message-ID: <179182310655.1218812.8140530228205116588.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20261009004353.3324350-1-k.chai@proxmox.com>
References: <20261009004353.3324350-1-k.chai@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791823122047
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.584 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: WLN6VGMCSC4XKFFMDTC7HODLJE7XUWDN
X-Message-ID-Hash: WLN6VGMCSC4XKFFMDTC7HODLJE7XUWDN
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:43:53 +0800, Kefu Chai wrote:
> Sorting the OSD tree by its Name column compared plain strings, so
> osd.10 came before osd.8. The tree saves its sort state, so the wrong
> order also survived reloads.
> 
> Compare names with localeCompare's numeric option, as
> storage/ContentView.js already does. OSDs now sort by ID, and hosts
> like pve2 and pve10 sort by number as well.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] fix #8098: ui: ceph: osd: sort OSDs naturally by name
      https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c3f5e5258f73f31e273493232a79d615fd9e072