From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E311FF0AD
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Sun, 04 Oct 2026 21:34:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4265E21680;
	Sun, 04 Oct 2026 21:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH storage] lvm plugin: snapshot: don't quietly ignore
 failure to rename back to original
Date: Sun,  4 Oct 2026 21:33:31 +0200
Message-ID: <179114230677.2862530.10512004480654499572.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260916132303.154117-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20260916132303.154117-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791142438462
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.632 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: DG4TLNUMR52OYEJQHRYL47V67LFFBJSS
X-Message-ID-Hash: DG4TLNUMR52OYEJQHRYL47V67LFFBJSS
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 15:22:30 +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> In case the new top volume cannot be allocated, an error for renaming
> back to the original name was quietly ignored. Log it as a task
> warning, because this is important.

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] lvm plugin: snapshot: don't quietly ignore failure to rename back to original
      https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-storage.git;a=commitdiff;h=f42f117b293deee376a84ccf0aeccefed231dfd2