From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90BD1FF09F for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:30:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE46421414; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:30:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Subject: applied: [PATCH container] api: mtunnel: fix handling of privileged containers Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:30:26 +0200 Message-ID: <178963742208.143734.15032925920461713595.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260908120035.416049-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20260908120035.416049-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1789637430513 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.723 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: J5OMTAX5MHADAF77I7Z777ZQBLYDR6LB X-Message-ID-Hash: J5OMTAX5MHADAF77I7Z777ZQBLYDR6LB X-MailFrom: w.bumiller@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 13:59:29 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > the unprivileged flag is only set in the config for unprivileged containers, > privileged containers normally simply do not have a value set. > > passing an undef value is persisted in the config as > > unprivileged: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] api: mtunnel: fix handling of privileged containers commit: 3a26da6db5e949418b2ec4eb6b383450feb7064d