From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27DB1FF0C0
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:13:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 25E5321575;
	Wed, 09 Sep 2026 02:13:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH docs v2 1/5] cephx-migration: Replace
 consumer with client
Date: Wed,  9 Sep 2026 02:12:22 +0200
Message-ID: <178891273886.586820.15473861587238750621.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260908153932.577051-2-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20260908153932.577051-2-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788912765625
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.870 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: GC7LHLJQNEGXP4ELYQVKN4IBULRJ3FY7
X-Message-ID-Hash: GC7LHLJQNEGXP4ELYQVKN4IBULRJ3FY7
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 17:39:27 +0200, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> The later term is used more often in the Proxmox VE documentation and upstream
> [1]. The Consumer row is removed from the table to avoid being redundant after
> replacing it with Client.
> 
> [1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/dev/cephx/
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied the first two one with a fixup for the broken table header, thanks!

[1/5] cephx-migration: Replace consumer with client
      commit: db5cc360cd999f6025832fc8a279f9751fbf1df4
[2/5] cephx-migration: Add link to CVE-2025-30156
      commit: e5584639fed5f9d4cb319b04853f0726f46d7e13