From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3C01FF0AE
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:47:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F3FB4214ED;
	Tue, 01 Sep 2026 14:47:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH qemu-server] qemu: viommu: small variable code
 cleanup
Date: Tue,  1 Sep 2026 14:46:54 +0200
Message-ID: <178826676890.166612.74485394150663090.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260831112543.2552200-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20260831112543.2552200-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788266817720
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.773 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: C4LQSOVROR247OLFU7TSRJWK2TEBXSAT
X-Message-ID-Hash: C4LQSOVROR247OLFU7TSRJWK2TEBXSAT
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:25:37 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> Reusing a variable the way done here reads not very nice and is easily
> missable and possibly misunderstood. Instead use a dedicated variable
> for the aw-bits additional and directly use that when pushing the
> devices to the list.
> 
> No functionality change intended.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks! I changed the commit title to be a bit clearer and
avoid the superfluous 'qemu' prefix.

[1/1] code cleanup: cfg2cmd: viommu: avoid unintuitive variable reuse
      commit: 9cba97b4f2d9244ea40ddac5130bc4d147bb1dc3