From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB05A1FF0B2
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:22:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB87E21636;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:22:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH qemu-server v2 0/3] memory: add
 verbose_description to NUMA policy
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 17:22:23 +0200
Message-ID: <178758491317.217193.8647985339369748950.b4-ty@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260312145423.434537-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20260312145423.434537-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1787584934495
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.827 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: KPCMBM3WAUHWLA5GGYQTBFJTRBE7HX7H
X-Message-ID-Hash: KPCMBM3WAUHWLA5GGYQTBFJTRBE7HX7H
X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:54:19 +0100, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote:
> Adds a more flavorful description to the NUMA policy option based on
> both qemu and the kernel's documentation. For now we simply paste the
> contents of the `qemu-system-x86_64(1)` manual.
> 
> One open question is if there is any precedent for URIs in verbose
> descriptions.
> 
> [...]

Applied the other two patches, thanks!

[1/3] memory: add verbose_description to NUMA policy
      commit: 15ccf5fd67cf9e6a049ad769fd67b4803ee7a968
[3/3] memory: fix unit in heuristic comment
      commit: cc0cd19a369f80d442d7ba3a2c2911c420af275f