From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528751FF0B2 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 64E1E215D2; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:31:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Maximiliano Sandoval Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 1/1] docs: cifs: match smbversion docs with pve-storage Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: <178757460007.144147.9161110034374562810.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260226144316.451521-3-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> References: <20260226144316.451521-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> <20260226144316.451521-3-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1787574650215 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.848 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: OYAKUCLWUPCTHQXHKBVCBCM7KX3U7BDR X-Message-ID-Hash: OYAKUCLWUPCTHQXHKBVCBCM7KX3U7BDR X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 15:43:15 +0100, Maximiliano Sandoval wrote: > Applied, thanks! I changed the commit title, added context to the commit message and kept the explicit 'Optional' declaration. [1/1] docs: cifs: fix description of default for 'smbversion' setting commit: b496391ed26fdadc519e5c8b90432f7801cf2c29