From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23E01FF0F0
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1A13C21524;
	Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Lukas Sichert <l.sichert@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH qemu-server] blockdev: recognize pflash devices on
 virt machines
Date: Mon,  3 Aug 2026 22:45:10 +0200
Message-ID: <178578990507.2787840.10282268992765732074.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260720122334.320518-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com>
References: <20260720122334.320518-1-l.sichert@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1785789907119
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.197 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: 5TGH6J3CBPDQMPKVBIARDOB32K6DXABG
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5TGH6J3CBPDQMPKVBIARDOB32K6DXABG
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:23:32 +0200, Lukas Sichert wrote:
> On ARM, QEMU's virt machine exposes EFI firmware pflash devices as
> '/machine/virt.flash0' and '/machine/virt.flash1'. The query-block
> mapping only recognized the x86-style '/machine/system.flash*' paths, so
> it failed to translate '/machine/virt.flash1' to 'efidisk0'. This made
> live cloning fail with 'no block node found for drive 'drive-efidisk0'.'
> 
> Accept both system.flash* and virt.flash* paths for these devices.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] blockdev: recognize pflash devices on virt machines
      https://git.proxmox.com/?p=qemu-server.git;a=commitdiff;h=46521b658fa98ec4d50c2780886dd6464b8ce06e