From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330F31FF142 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:38:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 90C16214A4; Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:38:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Nicolas Frey Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 0/2] software updates: improve user-facing update reference Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 15:37:29 +0200 Message-ID: <178308584540.1243269.13000360780887063656.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260611135847.276100-1-n.frey@proxmox.com> References: <20260611135847.276100-1-n.frey@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783085849640 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: AGOWJWEI3VBZ4K6JMZMO5SNEFB5EJ3FR X-Message-ID-Hash: AGOWJWEI3VBZ4K6JMZMO5SNEFB5EJ3FR X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:58:45 +0200, Nicolas Frey wrote: > more info in the respective patches. > > This came up quite a lot in enterprise support (often in combination > with unattended-upgrades, perhaps an addition for another patch?) to > the point where @Laurentiu and I had discussed improving the docs for > this. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] software updates: use apt instead of apt-get commit: 18834b7c95d008eb0bfbbc4305ced3c98cc8ffe7 [2/2] software updates: add warning about using apt upgrade commit: 86bddb2e3d393aa957d55f90a0a43cbdc35bb7d4