From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56E11FF135 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:55:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A6B2D2142D; Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:55:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Aaron Lauterer Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 1/2] pvesm: mention FC/SAS in the storage overview. Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:55:09 +0200 Message-ID: <178300050992.3208500.2271017835847031541.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260702110856.2205894-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20260702110856.2205894-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783000513308 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 5PRITYMY34XFXE6T2LIHISHNZGNM5YHX X-Message-ID-Hash: 5PRITYMY34XFXE6T2LIHISHNZGNM5YHX X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 02 Jul 2026 13:08:55 +0200, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > While not a dedicated storage plugin, it is possible to use FC and SAS > attached block storage. > > Make it clear that it works and can be used with the snapshots as a > volume chain feature as it needs LVM on top. > > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] pvesm: mention FC/SAS in the storage overview. commit: 5142c4ba922c110cd48c68ebf7a985b7144fbb7d [2/2] pvesm: update features for LVM,iSCSI,FC,SAS commit: b994b8b24dcc9169765171f07fe12c90e70e8b41