From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C203B1FF14C for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 01:16:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E705037930; Fri, 29 May 2026 01:15:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Fiona Ebner Subject: applied: [PATCH manager] ui: sdn: fabrics: node edit: fix typo to make editing node interfaces with existing IPv6 work Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 01:15:43 +0200 Message-ID: <178001014226.3746480.15228039365743933033.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260528145222.639478-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20260528145222.639478-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780010122359 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: AZ4N5JASG67XUDK3YXLCLYORHEMFTOFQ X-Message-ID-Hash: AZ4N5JASG67XUDK3YXLCLYORHEMFTOFQ X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 28 May 2026 16:50:43 +0200, Fiona Ebner wrote: > The data field is called 'ip6' in other places, not 'ipv6', for > example in the interfaces panel. > > If there is an interface with a pre-assigned IPv6 address, it > previously would not show, but submitting an edit would fail with an > error that the additional property 'ipv6' is not defined in the > schema: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] ui: sdn: fabrics: node edit: fix typo to make editing node interfaces with existing IPv6 work commit: 94e354e4521b575d7f7fcd01d3befa8b2224c663