From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C211FF136 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 22:06:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 387781A192; Mon, 18 May 2026 22:06:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hanreich Subject: applied: [PATCH manager/network/proxmox-ve-rs 0/3] Add tag as a match statement to route maps Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 22:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: <177913442763.4052615.15745825157167735711.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260513164346.503049-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20260513164346.503049-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779134783998 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: A6IXCVQCBXHE622TCX7IAW5IQATOKUM4 X-Message-ID-Hash: A6IXCVQCBXHE622TCX7IAW5IQATOKUM4 X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 13 May 2026 18:43:41 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > This patch series exposes the already implemented `match tag` FRR statement in > the UI. This seems to have been left out in the intial series due to failing to > add it to the API_SCHEMA enum and the error then proliferated from there. > > > proxmox-ve-rs: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] sdn: route map panel: add tag as match statement commit: 82e23563d2139994ea878af14035bf4e133ec934