From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C5EB1FF136 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 12:23:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0C1F8A8F1; Mon, 18 May 2026 12:23:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hanreich Subject: Re: [PATCH docs/manager/network/proxmox-ve-rs v3 00/18] Extend EVPN controller functionality Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 12:20:39 +0200 Message-ID: <177909919138.3110381.16677715963831765623.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260513150609.375436-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20260513150609.375436-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779099759951 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.121 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: XNVALQHLYI63OPW42NOJSCG5VYO4SD3F X-Message-ID-Hash: XNVALQHLYI63OPW42NOJSCG5VYO4SD3F X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 13 May 2026 17:05:46 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > Based on top of current WireGuard series [1], solely to avoid pve-docs merge > conflicts. > > ## Introduction > > This patch series lifts several existing restrictions on the EVPN controller: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [pve-network] [01/11] evpn controller: make nodes configurable commit: e388f01fd85469e809982e71c84cc06a781899bb [02/11] evpn controller: allow multiple evpn controllers in a cluster commit: 5339491b1864a0dd4809189ecbdf65dc01cfc1e0 [03/11] evpn controller: add bgp-mode setting commit: 42ee1b5425b13ece2bc8da39c2422f700dc9d62d [04/11] evpn zone: add secondary-controllers and rt filtering commit: 6ed7edb73fde42a3f64c4caf7ed791c618dad9cd [05/11] evpn controller: add ebgp-multihop setting commit: 787e7860e82743fbbdc86b0a68d3a52bb02e31fc [06/11] test: evpn: add test for ibgp + ebgp evpn controller commit: 9a1e5a2dea89abb04ec41c8e12d923629b43228a [07/11] test: evpn: add test for bgp-mode auto commit: 92cb312175d77aa75516c2a4c32c9f899dceab73 [08/11] tests: add rt_import test case when using multiple evpn controllers commit: e066d473a074e77a8c159c94d518839dd441731e [09/11] tests: add rt_import test case when using multiple evpn controllers commit: e066d473a074e77a8c159c94d518839dd441731e [10/11] tests: evpn: force ibgp over ebgp bgp controller with ebgp wan session commit: 98602f5c948201b9b31fb013a4489cfa788cfcd2 [11/11] tests: test route filtering mechanism with multiple zones/controllers commit: 5090487e8a31a6d3d4412c13977ba33d75ea8f5e [pve-docs] [1/2] sdn: evpn: document new zone / controller options commit: 059edc4ebd96bb2ae785360972421d0e8b540063 [2/2] sdn: fix typo in bgp controller commit: ae8dfbb647febca328fd613e19d87bed7fe291e3