From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128011FF14C for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 16:35:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 00876114D5; Fri, 15 May 2026 16:35:58 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Shannon Sterz Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH manager v5 4/8] fix #5076: ui: dc: add an optional "audiences" field for open id realms Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 16:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: <177885570417.4137547.6045525813711962895.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260423133548.349086-5-s.sterz@proxmox.com> References: <20260423133548.349086-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <20260423133548.349086-5-s.sterz@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778855746396 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.054 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: NCRD22AHRTEHDIAIPWNCPEPW7IKXUN66 X-Message-ID-Hash: NCRD22AHRTEHDIAIPWNCPEPW7IKXUN66 X-MailFrom: f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:35:44 +0200, Shannon Sterz wrote: > allows users to configure additional open id audiences that may be > provided by the open id realm. > > Originally-by: Alexander Abraham > [SS: > * removed unnecessary helper functions > * send the 'audiences' property as a string to the backend instead of > an array to be consistent with other options > * rephrased commit message for clarity > ] > > [...] Applied with d/control bump folded in, thanks! [4/8] fix #5076: ui: dc: add an optional "audiences" field for open id realms commit: e3f650cf924f77d4449b801f973613b65b0a8a15 Best regards, -- Fabian Grünbichler