From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359DC1FF14C for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 07:05:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 24669B820; Fri, 15 May 2026 07:05:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hanreich Subject: applied: [PATCH cluster/docs/manager/network/proxmox{-ve-rs,-perl-rs} v5 00/29] Add WireGuard as protocol to SDN fabrics Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 07:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: <177882145075.392510.11968434784827811442.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260512173145.596958-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20260512173145.596958-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778821496496 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.122 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: TDGDR5I7WYAY6RI6PFU6IOWCG36YQNZU X-Message-ID-Hash: TDGDR5I7WYAY6RI6PFU6IOWCG36YQNZU X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 12 May 2026 19:31:15 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > ## Introduction > > This patch series introduces WireGuard as fabric protocol. Potential use-cases > include: > > * Connecting to remote PBS / PDM instances > * Simple encryption layer for intra-DC VXLAN tunnels > * Secure migration network > * Connecting with remote PVE clusters > > [...] Applied, thanks! [01/13] network: sdn: generate wireguard configuration on apply commit: cdc488adf70495627b9fc1788abcc58ffcc73e60 [02/13] ui: fix parsing of property-strings when values contain = commit: 0ccf362ebbf80f28ad922d73e241f8cedfe7c9e4 [03/13] ui: fabrics: i18n: make node loading string translatable commit: bd84f2b85325852a5f29cc56da53b246791409b3 [04/13] sdn: fabrics view: handle case where interfaces are deleted commit: 22eae6d22f6e8de2d4b07faf90f9c49546fed5c3 [05/13] ui: fabrics: split node selector creation and config commit: ad6550787586bc309e869e378d6cd74ed682ef05 [06/13] ui: fabrics: edit: make ipv4/6 support generic over fabric panels commit: e5e3374273af56dad849ab970d057cc7f4338dfd [07/13] ui: fabrics: node: make ipv4/6 support generic over edit panels commit: 2e09809b6762be236667cba8da6177a2b2757d56 [08/13] ui: fabrics: interface: make ipv4/6 support generic over edit panels commit: f577357ee26abc7116009fa3c1b1d24c3ea20dea [09/13] ui: fabrics: wireguard: add interface edit panel commit: 800f2215c1508a384a95684a042de7cb9524647f [10/13] ui: fabrics: wireguard: add node edit panel commit: d115dfb45f6b92d04c5cce14ac232ca7492140ba [11/13] ui: fabrics: wireguard: add fabric edit panel commit: cfc0b8ded748d13c54c6394ed4fdd1a2ce7d1266 [12/13] ui: fabrics: hook up wireguard components commit: 9fa808781515591b28c70cd6a78fcd0b8464e7e9 [13/13] fabrics: node edit: add option to include wireguard interfaces commit: c2277dfa16f3dce9b56df779a90097c2bce64a93