From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97BD1FF14C for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 07:02:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 98DA4ADF9; Fri, 15 May 2026 07:02:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Subject: partially-applied: [PATCH manager/pmg-api/proxmox{,-backup,-perl-rs,-offline-mirror} 0/8] adapt subscription handling to alternative server IDs Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 07:00:58 +0200 Message-ID: <177882101837.373684.4926251066502624759.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260507115957.1497272-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> References: <20260507115957.1497272-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778821332671 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 3OBWOTRBJKRQAIB32QKMHRU345X2MTRE X-Message-ID-Hash: 3OBWOTRBJKRQAIB32QKMHRU345X2MTRE X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 07 May 2026 13:59:21 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > instead of only supporting one variant of server IDs, get a list of possible > candidates via the proxmox-subscription crate. if a subscription is already > configured, the matching server ID will be reused to avoid reissuing. > > v1: > - drop proxmox-systemd part, already applied > - add PMG changes > - add PDM changes > - add POM changes > - rebase > > [...] Applied the proxmox-subscription, the proxmox-backup, the proxmox-offline mirror and the proxmox-perl-rs one, thanks! [1/1] common: subscription: expose server ID candidates commit: 85b46aa4d93d64ae43da72e1dc5c8b0d5487d6ac