From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED16B1FF13A
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 13 May 2026 18:48:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E20BF1814C;
	Wed, 13 May 2026 18:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH docs 0/2] Improve route map documentation
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:48:01 +0200
Message-ID: <177869086091.1075898.10927835680616996570.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260513162013.456890-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
References: <20260513162013.456890-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778690885631
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: X2PF5PWV2BS2AZAP3K73GQ4DRTFPDEU4
X-Message-ID-Hash: X2PF5PWV2BS2AZAP3K73GQ4DRTFPDEU4
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Wed, 13 May 2026 18:20:09 +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> Removed the misleading note about having to create an explicit deny entry when
> calling a route map and also added a small section mentioning that every route
> map has an empty deny entry as its last entry.
> 
> 
> pve-docs:
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] sdn: route maps: mention implicit deny default explicitly
      commit: 8767063e577645d2f445329ec6711122f07a0fd0
[2/2] sdn: route map: delete note about creating an empty deny entry
      commit: dc6cbc20d4c466df1971eec7d9825cb733d46ff7