From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E8D1FF13A for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 05:08:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE2E63568D; Wed, 13 May 2026 05:08:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Gabriel Goller Subject: applied: [PATCH network] sdn: include fabrics when checking for pending changes Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 05:08:16 +0200 Message-ID: <177864169609.4078454.14661836602423166315.b4-ty@b4> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260507131000.304156-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> References: <20260507131000.304156-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778641597240 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: KGFARXPBTFNMUZ4DFKKFWDDZ3XDYK2CE X-Message-ID-Hash: KGFARXPBTFNMUZ4DFKKFWDDZ3XDYK2CE X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 07 May 2026 15:09:56 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote: > The lock api endpoint uses `has_pending_changes` to determine whether > the SDN configuration can be locked. Previously, the fabric config was > not included in the check, allowing a config with pending fabric changes > to be locked. Applied, thanks! [1/1] sdn: include fabrics when checking for pending changes commit: b6156a57b60d596a247f7d385beb8a9a60ae3d5c