From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3C91FF146
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 12 May 2026 04:10:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8120027454;
	Tue, 12 May 2026 04:10:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
	Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH manager 1/1] ceph: pool: fix pool statistics filter
 returning wrong pool's data
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 04:09:47 +0200
Message-ID: <177855178706.1260779.17492649606337858168.b4-ty@b4>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3
In-Reply-To: <20260331020739.818888-2-k.chai@proxmox.com>
References: <20260331020739.818888-2-k.chai@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1778551685273
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.003 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: ELV6AQIG6V3UIMNR6F5JDXNJLMAKK6EW
X-Message-ID-Hash: ELV6AQIG6V3UIMNR6F5JDXNJLMAKK6EW
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:07:39 +0800, Kefu Chai wrote:
> The condition filtering the 'ceph df' response to the requested pool
> had a logic error:
> 
>   next if !defined($d->{name}) && !$d->{name} ne "$pool";
> 
> With '&&', short-circuit evaluation means the name comparison is never
> reached when $d->{name} is defined. All entries with a defined name
> pass through, and $data->{statistics} ends up holding the stats of
> whichever pool appears last in the output.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] ceph: pool: fix pool statistics filter returning wrong pool's data
      commit: b0f4269e957a11798479aa3383faa86dd620a5cd